XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, alt.tv.stargate-sg1   
   XPost: uk.media.tv.misc   
   From: seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com   
      
   "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   news:hc3phl$g30$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   > Seth wrote:   
   >> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >> news:hc3d0e$7lb$2@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:hc13ib$atq$2@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>> David Johnston wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:23:10 -0400, Frank Frank   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> Greg Goss wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> Frank Frank  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>> news:hbsglt$sml$3@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> news:hbrako$7c1$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus Christ! An ipod can't even be OPENED UP by the customer,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> short of smashing it with a hammer, or hadn't you noticed?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> You have no clue what you are talking about.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Ad hominem argument duly noted.   
   >>>>>>>>> This is getting ludicrous. The irreplaceability of the iPod's   
   >>>>>>>>> battery is *common knowledge* for heaven's sake. It was one of the   
   >>>>>>>>> first major criticisms of the iPod back when the things were new!   
   >>>>>>>>> Surely you can't pretend never to have learned this particular   
   >>>>>>>>> fact? Unless of course you've been living in a cave for the past   
   >>>>>>>>> ten years or so.   
   >>>>>>>> The web page   
   >>>>>>> Web pages are irrelevant. The irreplaceability of the iPod's battery   
   >>>>>>> is *common knowledge* for heaven's sake.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Common knowledge is filled with misinformation.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Are you calling me a liar now?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> At this point, yes.   
   >>>   
   >>> Ad hominem argument duly noted.   
   >>>   
   >>> I am honest enough to argue with reason and evidence rather than   
   >>> namecalling, mudslinging, and the like.   
   >>   
   >> It wasn't name calling.   
   >   
   > Sure it was.   
      
      
   No, you asked a yes/no question and got a yes/no answer.   
      
   Don't like the answer, don't ask the question...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)