home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.startrek.current      New Star Trek shows, movies and books      77,414 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 75,507 of 77,414   
   Seth to Frank Frank   
   Re: 40-yr-old reruns of Star Trek beatin   
   26 Oct 09 04:39:08   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, alt.tv.stargate-sg1   
   XPost: uk.media.tv.misc   
   From: seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com   
      
   "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   news:hc3d0e$7lb$2@news.eternal-september.org...   
   > Seth wrote:   
   >> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >> news:hc13ib$atq$2@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>> David Johnston wrote:   
   >>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:23:10 -0400, Frank Frank   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>> Greg Goss wrote:   
   >>>>>> Frank Frank  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:hbsglt$sml$3@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>> news:hbrako$7c1$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Jesus Christ! An ipod can't even be OPENED UP by the customer,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> short of smashing it with a hammer, or hadn't you noticed?   
   >>>>>>>>>> You have no clue what you are talking about.   
   >>>>>>>>> Ad hominem argument duly noted.   
   >>>>>>> This is getting ludicrous. The irreplaceability of the iPod's   
   >>>>>>> battery is *common knowledge* for heaven's sake. It was one of the   
   >>>>>>> first major criticisms of the iPod back when the things were new!   
   >>>>>>> Surely you can't pretend never to have learned this particular fact?   
   >>>>>>> Unless of course you've been living in a cave for the past ten years   
   >>>>>>> or so.   
   >>>>>> The web page   
   >>>>> Web pages are irrelevant. The irreplaceability of the iPod's battery   
   >>>>> is *common knowledge* for heaven's sake.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Common knowledge is filled with misinformation.   
   >>>   
   >>> Are you calling me a liar now?   
   >>   
   >> At this point, yes.   
   >   
   > Ad hominem argument duly noted.   
   >   
   > I am honest enough to argue with reason and evidence rather than   
   > namecalling, mudslinging, and the like.   
      
      
   It wasn't name calling. You asked a question and it was answered.   
      
   And honest would be to acknowledge rather than delete the web link clearly   
   showing how to perform the task you say can't be performed.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca