XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, alt.tv.stargate-sg1   
   XPost: uk.media.tv.misc   
   From: seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com   
      
   "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   news:hc423d$fcn$3@news.eternal-september.org...   
   > Seth wrote:   
   >> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >> news:hc3phl$g30$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:hc3d0e$7lb$2@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:hc13ib$atq$2@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>> David Johnston wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:23:10 -0400, Frank Frank   
   >>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> Greg Goss wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> Frank Frank  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> news:hbsglt$sml$3@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hbrako$7c1$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus Christ! An ipod can't even be OPENED UP by the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> customer, short of smashing it with a hammer, or hadn't you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noticed?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have no clue what you are talking about.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ad hominem argument duly noted.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> This is getting ludicrous. The irreplaceability of the iPod's   
   >>>>>>>>>>> battery is *common knowledge* for heaven's sake. It was one of   
   >>>>>>>>>>> the first major criticisms of the iPod back when the things were   
   >>>>>>>>>>> new! Surely you can't pretend never to have learned this   
   >>>>>>>>>>> particular fact? Unless of course you've been living in a cave   
   >>>>>>>>>>> for the past ten years or so.   
   >>>>>>>>>> The web page   
   >>>>>>>>> Web pages are irrelevant. The irreplaceability of the iPod's   
   >>>>>>>>> battery is *common knowledge* for heaven's sake.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Common knowledge is filled with misinformation.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Are you calling me a liar now?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> At this point, yes.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Ad hominem argument duly noted.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I am honest enough to argue with reason and evidence rather than   
   >>>>> namecalling, mudslinging, and the like.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It wasn't name calling.   
   >>>   
   >>> Sure it was.   
   >>   
   >> No   
   >   
   > Yes.   
      
      
   Again with the creative post trimming to suit your needs.   
      
   I can only conslude 3 possibly scenarios.   
   - Purposeful troll   
   - Dishonest   
   - Ignorant   
      
   Not really interested in which it is as you appear to be incapable of   
   reason.  Go ahead and have your last word if you need, I'm done.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)