Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,414 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 75,562 of 77,414    |
|    Ian Galbraith to Jim Gysin    |
|    Re: Star Trek Enhanced - yanked off the     |
|    28 Oct 09 13:06:24    |
      XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv       From: me@privacy.net              On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:35:36 -0500, Jim Gysin wrote:              > Ian Galbraith sent the following on 10/26/2009 10:21 PM:       [snip]              >> I don't see how wanting to set a reasonable time limit on copyright is       >> selfish, self serving and stealing.       >       > Shouldn't the creator be the one to decide what is a reasonable time limit?              And the answer would be eternally then. Why should his heirs benefit from       something they had no hand in creating?              > But to answer your question, it is selfish and self-serving because it       > puts people in a position to get something for free that they would       > otherwise have to purchase if they wanted to obtain it legally, and it's       > painfully obvious that they don't want to pay for it.              No-one in this thread is saying get rid of copyright. By the time its out       of copyright there are other considerations like allowing others to use       cultural icons to produce their own culturally enriching works and       allowing competitive forces to ensure the works in question are still       available in some form.              >> Frankly I think the opposite is true,       >> are you really trying to claim that Disney isn't greedy?       >       > Disney is mo more or less greedy than anyone else, and their greed is       > centered around wanting to protect *their* assets--things that they have       > created or developed legally              But under your scheme a large number of major Disney productions of the       last few years are using assets that would have been copyrighted and       therefore illegal. As for Disney's original assets the actual creators       are long since dead.              >--whereas the greed of some in this thread       > is centered around wanting something for nothing.              I see no evidence of that in this thread.              --       "Indiscriminate niceness is overrated" - House              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca