XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, alt.tv.stargate-sg1   
   XPost: uk.media.tv.misc   
   From: dragonlady60@q.com   
      
   "Seth"  wrote in message   
   news:hc42ib$jqo$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   > "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   > news:hc423d$fcn$3@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >> Seth wrote:   
   >>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:hc3phl$g30$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:hc3d0e$7lb$2@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> news:hc13ib$atq$2@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>> David Johnston wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:23:10 -0400, Frank Frank   
   >>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> Greg Goss wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Frank Frank  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hbsglt$sml$3@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hbrako$7c1$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus Christ! An ipod can't even be OPENED UP by the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> customer, short of smashing it with a hammer, or hadn't you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noticed?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have no clue what you are talking about.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ad hominem argument duly noted.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> This is getting ludicrous. The irreplaceability of the iPod's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> battery is *common knowledge* for heaven's sake. It was one of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> the first major criticisms of the iPod back when the things   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> were new! Surely you can't pretend never to have learned this   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> particular fact? Unless of course you've been living in a cave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> for the past ten years or so.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> The web page   
   >>>>>>>>>> Web pages are irrelevant. The irreplaceability of the iPod's   
   >>>>>>>>>> battery is *common knowledge* for heaven's sake.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Common knowledge is filled with misinformation.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Are you calling me a liar now?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> At this point, yes.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Ad hominem argument duly noted.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I am honest enough to argue with reason and evidence rather than   
   >>>>>> namecalling, mudslinging, and the like.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It wasn't name calling.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Sure it was.   
   >>>   
   >>> No   
   >>   
   >> Yes.   
   >   
   >   
   > Again with the creative post trimming to suit your needs.   
   >   
   > I can only conslude 3 possibly scenarios.   
   > - Purposeful troll   
   > - Dishonest   
   > - Ignorant   
   >   
   > Not really interested in which it is as you appear to be incapable of   
   > reason.  Go ahead and have your last word if you need, I'm done.   
   >   
      
   He certainly has all the characteristics of the first one - especially given   
   the second and third ones *are* characteristics of the first one.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)