home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.startrek.current      New Star Trek shows, movies and books      77,408 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 75,588 of 77,408   
   Frank Frank to Dragon Lady   
   Re: 40-yr-old reruns of Star Trek beatin   
   28 Oct 09 03:46:19   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, alt.tv.stargate-sg1   
   XPost: uk.media.tv.misc   
   From: candid@dontbother.invalid   
      
   Dragon Lady wrote:   
   > "Seth"  wrote in message   
   > news:hc42ib$jqo$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >> news:hc423d$fcn$3@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:hc3phl$g30$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:hc3d0e$7lb$2@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>> Ad hominem argument duly noted.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I am honest enough to argue with reason and evidence rather than   
   >>>>>>> namecalling, mudslinging, and the like.   
   >>>>>> It wasn't name calling.   
   >>>>> Sure it was.   
   >>>> No   
   >>> Yes.   
   >>   
   >> I can only conslude 3 possibly scenarios.   
   >> - Purposeful troll   
   >> - Dishonest   
   >> - Ignorant   
   >>   
   >> Not really interested in which it is as you appear to be incapable of   
   >> reason.   
   >   
   > He certainly has all the characteristics of the first one - especially given   
   > the second and third ones *are* characteristics of the first one.   
      
   Ad hominem arguments duly noted.   
      
   Get back to me when you have a *real* argument.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca