Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 75,651 of 77,408    |
|    Jim Gysin to All    |
|    Re: Star Trek Enhanced - yanked off the     |
|    28 Oct 09 16:24:45    |
      XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv       From: jimgysin@geemail.com              Frank Frank sent the following on 10/28/2009 3:24 AM:       > Jim Gysin wrote:       >> Frank Frank sent the following on 10/26/2009 12:47 AM:       >>> Jim Gysin wrote:       >>>> Frank Frank sent the following on 10/25/2009 7:03 AM:       >>>>> aemeijers wrote:       >>>>>> Frank Frank wrote:       >>>>>>> aemeijers wrote:       >>>>>>>> Frank Frank wrote:       >>>>>>>>> Jack Bohn wrote:       >>>>>>>>>> Frank Frank wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>> SFTV_troy wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>> Has Paramount put this show back in the vault? It appears       >>>>>>>>>>>> they have,       >>>>>>>>>>>> and released TNG as a replacement.       >>>>>>>>>>> Can they do that? Stop someone airing Star Trek AFTER having       >>>>>>>>>>> sold the syndication rights to them?       >>>>>>>>>> Well, it's not so much "sold" as "rented." The rights to air are       >>>>>>>>>> probably licensed for some time frame, and then the syndicator       >>>>>>>>>> offers a new license (or not) and the stations pick it up again       >>>>>>>>>> (or not).       >>>>>>>>> Why would they not, though? If you have a product to sell and       >>>>>>>>> there is demand. It would be as if Wal-Mart decided to close its       >>>>>>>>> shops from October until next March or something like that --       >>>>>>>>> what possible kind of business sense could that make?       >>>>>>>> Ask Disney. They do the same thing with most of their 'classic'       >>>>>>>> animated films. Last thing they want is for people to get bored       >>>>>>>> with the product. (or in the case of videos, to be competing with       >>>>>>>> their own product selling for a buck at garage sales.) About a       >>>>>>>> seven-year cycle, which is the right interval for a fresh       >>>>>>>> generation of their target demographic of kids, as well as for       >>>>>>>> young parents to get past their snotty late-teenage and college       >>>>>>>> years, and be nostalgic about the films they saw 7 or 14 years       >>>>>>>> ago. TV cycle isn't that long, of course. There isn't enough       >>>>>>>> product out there for that.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Even the digital remastering and sweetened SFX for TOS were right       >>>>>>>> out of the Disney playbook. Last go-around for most of the 'name'       >>>>>>>> Disney Classics, they trumpeted how they were 'restored' from       >>>>>>>> original masters.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Old rule of show biz- always leave them wanting more.       >>>>>>> But it's artificial scarcity. It's evil. If someone wants it now       >>>>>>> they should be able to have it now if they have the money to cover       >>>>>>> the costs (parts + labour) for providing one more marginal unit.       >>>>>> Shrug. If they don't wanna sell, you have no right to buy.       >>>>> No thanks to their monopoly. If one business isn't willing to       >>>>> manufacture and sell wibbles, I should have the option of buying       >>>>> wibbles from another business, really.       >>>> Why?       >>> It's called "capitalism". If you don't get it, then feel free to move       >>> to China, Cuba, or North Korea.       >> The last time I looked, capitalism was a voluntary arrangement on *both*       >> sides.       >       > I don't disagree.              And yet you advocate various forms of thuggery and theft to get what you       want for a price that the seller would otherwise be unwilling to accept.              > But you restraining trade by other businesses is not       > capitalism; it's monopoly.              I'm not restraining trade, as they're free to trade anything that they       have a right to be trading in the first place. Rather, I am restraining       theft.              >> You may want to re-take your high school economics course.       >> Unless you're still in grade school, in which case you may want to pay       >> attention when you grow up and take econ in high school.       >       > Ad hominem argument duly noted.       >       > Get back to me when you have a *real* argument.              Get back to me when you've taken or re-taken high school econ.              --       Jim Gysin       Waukesha, WI              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca