XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, alt.tv.stargate-sg1   
   XPost: uk.media.tv.misc   
   From: candid@dontbother.invalid   
      
   Mac Breck wrote:   
   > Frank Frank wrote:   
   >> Mac Breck wrote:   
   >>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:hc423d$fcn$3@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:hc3phl$g30$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>> Seth wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> "Frank Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:hc3d0e$7lb$2@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>> Ad hominem argument duly noted.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I am honest enough to argue with reason and evidence rather   
   >>>>>>>>> than namecalling, mudslinging, and the like.   
   >>>>>>>> It wasn't name calling.   
   >>>>>>> Sure it was.   
   >>>>>> No   
   >>>>> Yes.   
   >>>> I can only conslude 3 possibly scenarios.   
   >>>> - Purposeful troll   
   >>>> - Dishonest   
   >>>> - Ignorant   
   >>> He's all of the above, plus a waste of time.   
   >> Ad hominem arguments duly noted.   
   >>   
   >> Get back to me when you have a *real* argument.   
   >   
   > LOL  [rhetorical] Why? [/rhetorical] You'll just snip it, and pretend it   
   > never existed, as you've done here, many, many times previously.   
      
   I will if it's another ad hom argument instead of one that's about the   
   actual topic, sure.   
      
   The rest of your latest post consisted of ad hominem attacks and was   
   deleted, for example.   
      
   Get back to me when you have a *real* argument.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)