Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 75,764 of 77,408    |
|    Jim Gysin to All    |
|    Re: Star Trek Enhanced - yanked off the     |
|    29 Oct 09 17:53:58    |
      XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv       From: jimgysin@geemail.com              Ian Galbraith sent the following on 10/28/2009 5:03 PM:       > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:19:34 -0500, Jim Gysin wrote:       >       > [snip]       >       >> In terms of the bigger picture, it never ceases to amaze me when people       >> fail to see the damaging effects of the disincentives that they're so       >> willing to promote. And it's not just as it relates to creative types,       >> but to the best of the best in anything. Few people will make an effort       >> to stand out and produce great things if the end result is that a horde       >> of ingrates steal their output or decide, by judicial thuggery, to tell       >> them how much their efforts are worth in a "fair" society. It's       >> parasitism at its worst.       >       > Strawman, everyone on this thread except for 1 person wants some       > reasonable term of copyright to enable creators to reap a benefit and       > continue creating.              And you all want to force the creators of the world to accept *your*       definition of "reasonable." Again, it's thuggery. Granted, you're not       in the same cheap ass thief league as Seamus, but it's still thuggery.              If you honestly believe in freedom, why not allow them to be free to       define the term for themselves, at which point you're free to accept       their selling terms or to deny yourself the benefits of the works that       only they can create?              Here's what would happen in a truly free society. Each artist would set       his own terms, and those who set their terms too high will not sell much       of their work. As a result, they will lower their prices and adjust       their terms according so that their price and terms reflect what society       is willing to *freely* offer in exchange for access to that work. And       if society and its creators cannot come to terms, then it sounds to me       as if society doesn't see much real benefit to those works in the first       place.              --       Jim Gysin       Waukesha, WI              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca