XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net
In article ,
James Sidbury wrote:
> In article ,
> Jim Gysin wrote:
>
> > James Sidbury sent the following on 10/28/2009 8:43 PM:
> > > In article ,
> > > Jim Gysin wrote:
> > >
> > >> "Society's interest" be damned. Society has no claim on me in this
> > >> regard.
> > >
> > > Society invented the concept of copyright. So if you copyright your
> > > works you are accepting what copyright says.
> >
> > The word "duress" comes to mind, along with the realization that a
> > certain, unacceptable level of protection is better than no protection
> > at all.
> >
> > > If the copyright laws
> > > change then you can choose in the future not to copyright your works and
> > > use your own rules which will probably mean you will not make your IP
> > > publicly available.
> >
> > At which point, the cheapskates of the world will have won at the
> > expense of artists and the people who would have otherwise been willing
> > to support those artists. That's not exactly what I call a good or fair
> > outcome.
>
> Do you think it's fair that Disney used fairy tales which were public
> domain and now wants to have complete control over these derivative
> works in perpetuity?
Yes. You're completely welcome to make your own new derivative work
from the same source material Disney used. Why should you get to the
original materials they created?
>
> How would you feel if copyrights were severely limited in scope if the
> work were derived from some previous work that was public domain?
>
> dick
--
Stargate Universe SGU: It puts the "U" in "SUCKS"!
It's the show 'Defiling Gravity' would be if DG had more regulars,
fewer abortions, worse writers, and no budget for lighting.
Remember, you can't spell "disgust" without SGU!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
