XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net   
      
   In article ,   
    Thanatos  wrote:   
      
   > In article ,   
   >  Anim8rFSK  wrote:   
   >   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  Thanatos  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > In article ,   
   > > >  Anim8rFSK  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > In article ,   
   > > > >  James Sidbury  wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > In article ,   
   > > > > >  Jim Gysin  wrote:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > James Sidbury sent the following on 10/28/2009 8:43 PM:   
   > > > > > > > In article ,   
   > > > > > > >  Jim Gysin  wrote:   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >> "Society's interest" be damned.  Society has no claim on me in   
   > > > > > > >> this   
   > > > > > > >> regard.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Society invented the concept of copyright.  So if you copyright   
   > > > > > > > your   
   > > > > > > > works you are accepting what copyright says.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > The word "duress" comes to mind, along with the realization that a   
   > > > > > > certain, unacceptable level of protection is better than no   
   > > > > > > protection   
   > > > > > > at all.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > If the copyright laws   
   > > > > > > > change then you can choose in the future not to copyright your   
   > > > > > > > works   
   > > > > > > > and   
   > > > > > > > use your own rules which will probably mean you will not make   
   > > > > > > > your   
   > > > > > > > IP   
   > > > > > > > publicly available.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > At which point, the cheapskates of the world will have won at the   
   > > > > > > expense of artists and the people who would have otherwise been   
   > > > > > > willing   
   > > > > > > to support those artists.  That's not exactly what I call a good or   
   > > > > > > fair   
   > > > > > > outcome.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Do you think it's fair that Disney used fairy tales which were public   
   > > > > > domain and now wants to have complete control over these derivative   
   > > > > > works in perpetuity?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Yes.  You're completely welcome to make your own new derivative work   
   > > > > from the same source material Disney used. Why should you get to the   
   > > > > original materials they created?   
   > > >   
   > > > Why should Disney?   
   > >   
   > > Because they created them.   
   >   
   > Really? Disney created Pocahantas, Aladdin and Pinocchio?   
      
   They created THEIR versions.  As I keep saying, you're welcome to may   
   your OWN version of those 3, as many many many many other people have   
   done and continue to do.  You don't get to steal the Disney version,   
   just as nobody gets to steal YOUR version.   
      
   --   
   Stargate Universe SGU:  It puts the "U" in "SUCKS"!   
   It's the show 'Defiling Gravity' would be if DG had more regulars,   
   fewer abortions, worse writers, and no budget for lighting.   
   Remember, you can't spell "disgust" without SGU!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)