Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 75,908 of 77,408    |
|    Lance Corporal Hammer Schultz to Brian Thorn    |
|    Re: Nemesis    |
|    28 Nov 09 15:59:58    |
      From: starfist@gmail.dot.com              On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:29:18 -0600, Brian Thorn wrote:              >>I think part of what I didn't like about Nemesis was how magical the       >>tech started to get. For that movie we had an emergency transport       >>device that was the size of a communion wafer and was able to beam       >>Picard back to the Enterprise after the Enterprise transporters were       >>pulverized.       >       > A simple line of dialogue about the wafer being tied in to one of the       > Shuttle's transporters would have been an easy explanation. I wonder       > if such a line got dumped in editing.              That wouldn't work either. A shuttle transporter can easily transport       two people, so Data wouldn't have had to die.              But this was just one of many -- how did they manage to find a       "positronic signature" for B4 *light years away without even looking       for it*? Does that mean anyone can find out where Data is (was) light       years away?              And where did Picard's clone get B4 anyway? Too many contrivances       pull me out of the story.              > But honestly, that didn't bug me much. It wouldn't be Star Trek if it       > didn't have a "hey, wait how the heck did THAT work" moment or a "why       > didn't they just do THIS like they did in x episode" moment.              That's true, but there has to be a limit to how much magic happens.       Too much and I can't stay in the narrative.              >>Oh, and why did Pickard's clone want to murder every last human? Did       >>they ever explain his motivation for that -- given what the *Romulans*       >>did to him and his comrade Remans?       >       > He was nuts, wasn't he? He killed the whole Romulan Senate. Why expect       > a rational explanation?              Good villains are not internally irrational. Nero (in Star Trek) was       out for revenge and wanted to protect the future Romulan Empire from       the Federation. Okay, I can go with that -- Kahn was blinded by       revenge too. But what was Picard's clone's beef with humanity? He       knew he was cloned *by Romulans*. He was dumped into a mine and left       to die *by Romulans.* Why is he hell-bent on wiping out humanity?       And I don't mean "explain it so it makes sense," I mean *clue me in       on his motivation.* I don't have to agree with it, but it has to       exist in order for me to get into the character.              --       Lance Corporal "Hammer" Schultz       Promote someone else.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca