home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.startrek.current      New Star Trek shows, movies and books      77,408 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 75,993 of 77,408   
   Anim8rFSK to Dan Dassow   
   Re: The Case For Star Trek Winning Best    
   13 Dec 09 17:55:28   
   
   d6676afe   
   XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.tos, rec.arts.movies.current-films, rec.arts.sf.tv   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net   
      
   In article   
   <7179f4fa-9e45-4556-9934-f4e6384164cb@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,   
    Dan Dassow  wrote:   
      
   > On Dec 13, 4:29 pm, Anim8rFSK  wrote:   
   > > In article   
   > > ,   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >  r...@aol.com wrote:   
   > > > > > Consider that Star Trek is on a par with Star Wars, an   
   > > > > > iconic American property that even older Academy voters   
   > > > > > can appreciate.     
   > >   
   > > > > Which isn't the same as saying Star Trek 2009 is on par with Star Wars   
   > > > > 1977. Not even close. Not the same solar system.   
   > >   
   > > > And even just from a technical standpoint, Star Wars stood alone in   
   > > > 1977 simply by the fact that the means to produce it had to be drawn   
   > > > up from scratch.  The talent and production pipelines to make such a   
   > > > film today are all over Hollywood (and the world, i.e. Weta in NZ) and   
   > > > we see the results on a weekly basis, but back then the studios had   
   > > > disbanded their effects units, farming out what little effects they   
   > > > needed to the few model or optical houses in existence.  The   
   > > > requirements of Star Wars required the creation of Industrial Light   
   > > > and Magic, or it never would have been possible.  CE3K was another   
   > > > notable effects movie from 1977 (yet less over-the-top), but that's   
   > > > about it.  Star Wars being unique and unusual (and a great time to   
   > > > boot) got it Oscar's attention.   
   > >   
   > > And look what won the Oscar just the year before:  Logan's Run, with   
   > > it's pathetic tiny out of focus models.  Star Wars took everything to a   
   > > whole new level.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > > (The only studio that seemed to still have the capability to do an   
   > > > entire effects-laden production in-house was Disney with "The Black   
   > > > Hole."  Perhaps their animated films required an active technical   
   > > > department so they never shut it down.)   
   > >   
   > > > Rik   
   > >   
   > > But the FX in "The Black Hole" are *terrible*   
   > >   
   >   
   > I would have used the words pathetic and laughable, but the point is   
   > the same.   
   >   
   > Dan Dassow   
      
   I reserve "pathetic and laughable" for Yvette with her head wrapped in   
   tinfoil.  :)   
      
   --   
   Happy 30th Anniversary   
   STAR TREK THE MOTION PICTURE   
   http://www.onedigitallife.com/images/star-trek-the-motion-picture.jpg   
   "The Human Adventure Is Just Beginning"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca