home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.startrek.current      New Star Trek shows, movies and books      77,408 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 76,102 of 77,408   
   Lance Corporal Hammer Schultz to David E. Powell   
   Re: Star Trek TNG in hi-def: Looks bette   
   02 Jan 10 18:55:33   
   
   7e80142b   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: starfist@gmail.dot.com   
      
   On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:28:16 -0800 (PST), David E. Powell wrote:   
      
   > The TNG DVDs came out a while ago, I'd heard good reviews of them   
   > before, not anything about bad quality. I've had them on my "I ought   
      
   I never realized how shoddy the transfers are until I got a   
   large-screen display -- I originally watched them on a 32" TV and they   
   looked fine, but now on my 52" they are merely acceptable.  Now I can   
   really see the difference between a good SD transfer and a bad one.   
   There are plenty of sets published around the same time as the TNG   
   sets that look a *lot* better.   
      
   I would still pick them up if you're a fan -- but the transfers just   
   don't measure up to other sets, and they really are over-priced in   
   comparison to other series sets on the market.   
      
   --   
   Lance Corporal "Hammer" Schultz   
   Promote someone else.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca