Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 76,114 of 77,408    |
|    Lance Corporal Hammer Schultz to All    |
|    Re: Star Trek TNG in hi-def: Looks bette    |
|    05 Jan 10 10:30:45    |
      bd2202c1       XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv       From: starfist@gmail.dot.com              On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 07:02:12 -0800 (PST), SFTV_troy wrote:              > It's probably a double-layer DVD which hold 8.5 gigs, or almost double       > the space the Star Trek discs had.              I'm not going to check, but I'd lay money that the TNG discs are       dual-layer.              > True. And the engineers are better because they've learned how to       > review the video and "add more bits" to scenes that appear       > pixelated. Back in 2001 they probably didn't realize that MPEG2       > needed to be tweaked, and instead just let the compression run       > automatically, and so we got very poor transfer of dark scenes              You're talking about variable bitrate, which isn't new and which is       also automated. The software is just better now.              --       Lance Corporal "Hammer" Schultz       Promote someone else.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca