4c98a342   
   XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.voyager, rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: your.name@isp.com   
      
   In article ,   
   Anim8rFSK  wrote:   
      
   > In article <091120102310014373%bubba@nowhere.edu.invalid>,   
   >  Professor Bubba  wrote:   
   >   
   > > In article , Wickeddoll   
   > >  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 02:12:11 -0600, "Ken from Chicago"   
   > > > >"Anim8rFSK"   
   > > > >> trag   
   > > > >>> > "Ubiquitous" wrote in message   
   > > > >>>   
   > > > >>> > > In your opinion, which are the three WORST Star Trek:   
   Voyager (VOY)   
   > > > >>> > > episodes?   
   > > > >>>   
   > > > >>> What was that episode which showed Janeway's ancestor and some stupid   
   > > > >>> arch or shopping center or something that was going to be built and   
   > > > >>> her book store was in the way.     I'd nominate that one.   
   > > > >>   
   > > > >> Millenium.  And, yes, they got the year of the Millenium wrong.   
   And the   
   > > > >> year of the 21st Century.   
   > > > >>   
   > > > Are you sure?  I would have sworn that was "11:59"   
   > > > >   
   > > > >Oh not the Y2K vs 2K1 debate again!   
   > > > >   
   > > > >-- Ken from Chicago   
   > > >   
   > > > Not from me.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > It's going to come up again in a month or two when 2011 arrives and the   
   > > usual suspects insist that 2011 is actually when the new decade begins.   
   > >   
   > > Not that this will do any good ... but we do not observe "the 201st   
   > > decade," which begins in 2011.  We observe "the 2010s," which began   
   > > this year.   
   >   
   > Every year is the beginning of '*a* new decade'   
      
   Not quite true ... if the universe exploded / imploded in five years and   
   time stops, then this year would not be the beginning of a decade.   ;-)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)