XPost: alt.startrek.voyager, rec.arts.tv   
   From: David@block.net   
      
   On 2/22/2013 4:30 PM, Your Name wrote:   
   > In article , David Johnston   
   >  wrote:   
   >> On 2/21/2013 10:30 PM, Your Name wrote:   
   >>> In article   
   >>> <8a6e3540-b4f9-407a-be17-4dc689e4f223@w14g2000vba.googlegroups.com>, Ed   
   >>> Stasiak  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Ubiquitous   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> By Caillan Davenport   
   >>>>> Posted at February 21, 2001   
   >>>>   
   >>>> As the article is 13 years old, what was the verdict?   
   >>>   
   >>> Not really relevant any more - JJ Abrams has killed off that entire   
   >>> timeline completely with his silly pretend Star Trek movies.  :-(   
   >>   
   >> Since Abrams is using "Time travel always spawns a new universe" no he   
   >> hasn't.   
   >   
   > Since we're now never ever going to get a real "Star Trek" movie or TV   
   > series again, he HAS killed it off.   
   >   
      
   Well of course not.  Shatner and Nimoy are really, really freaking old.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)