Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 76,403 of 77,408    |
|    Ohioguy to All    |
|    My review of Star Trek: into darkness    |
|    18 May 13 08:18:12    |
      From: none@none.net               It's no World War Z (complete turd), but it sure tries hard to be a       mashup between 1982's Star Trek II and Transformers. The movie is more       of a "whiz-bang" action movie that just *happens* to have some Star Trek       stuff in it.               ST: Into darkness is actually a pretty passable action flick, if you       like things moving around so fast that it distracts you all the time       from following the plot, much like the Transformers movies. (Man, each       time I promise myself I won't go watch another one, but then I do anyway)               One of the main characters resigns from his post for ethical reasons       for all of 20 minutes. Another is demoted for perhaps 15 minutes before       being reinstated to his original post. Another main character dies -       for about 10 minutes before being brought back to life just like in the       comic books, completely negating any meaningful reaction from fans to       his death and noble sacrifice. The movie is chock full of very       temporary changes like this.               Doctor McCoy's lines are pretty funny through the movie - until they       start to overdo it - and then you start to wince as they keep pushing it       more and more, and he just seems like an annoying stand up comedian.               You know that a movie is kind of bad when you wife turns to a little       more than halfway through and jokes about a zombie tribble turning into       the first Borg, and you turn to here and respond with "You will be       assimilated - cooo!" We usually only do that sort of thing with the       really bad movies, when we're bored.               You get the feeling while watching the movie that Paramount didn't       learn a single lesson from Star Trek Nemesis. No, we don't want you to       simply copy an old successful movie from the series so that you can make       more $. We want a completely new plot, for once. (how about a sequel to       another old episode, like you did with Space Seed?) Oh, there were some       surprises this time around that kept it from quite sinking to that       level, but overall that was what they were trying to do here.               If I had to list my LEAST favorite Star Trek movies, in order from       the one I liked the least, it would be something like this:              Star Trek Nemesis (ripoff, bad plot, weak villain)       Star Trek: The Motion Picture (much too slow)       Star Trek: Into Darkness (whiz-bang fast, parody of itself, ripoff plot)       Star Trek V: (unbalanced, silly God story, happy vulcans)       Star Trek III (a whole movie about undoing the previous one)               I guess after watching Star Trek: Into Darkness, I would suggest that       Trek fans instead try one of these:              http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Star_Trek:_Invasion!              or              http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&fi       ld-keywords=star+trek+collective       (any of the first 6 results would be excellent viewing, depending        on your personal preferences)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca