XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, rec.arts.tv   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: Obveeus@aol.com   
      
   On 6/26/2017 3:12 PM, Jim G. wrote:   
   > Obveeus sent the following on 06/26/2017 at 01:16 PM:>   
   >> On 6/26/2017 1:22 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:   
   >>> In article ,   
   >>>    "Jim G."  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> anim8rfsk sent the following on 06/24/2017 at 04:44 PM:   
   >>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>     "Jim G."  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> But don't you think this whole thing is staging, so that they can cry   
   >>>>> 'racist' to *any* complaint about Star Trek STD?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Are the people behind this thing competent or clever enough to pull off   
   >>>> something like that? Because they're clearly not competent or clever   
   >>>> enough to pull off a good Trek prequel. (I just saw a photo of a   
   >>>> transporter room, and these people are consistent, if nothing else.)   
   >>>   
   >>> I saw that that was out there and didn't even bother to look at it.  How   
   >>> badly does *that* bode?   
   >>>   
   >>> Bear in mind that this is set in exactly the same year as THE CAGE, so   
   >>> we *know* what stuff should look like.   
   >>   
   >> The transporter preview image that has been shown is from the older   
   >> ship, not the more current ship (Discovery).   
   >   
   > Do you have a cite for that? Because everything that I saw when this   
   > came out made it clear that it was unknown if the image was of the older   
   > ship or the newer one.   
      
   http://ew.com/tv/2017/06/22/star-trek-discovery-transporter-room/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)