XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, rec.arts.tv
XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: weberm@polaris.net
jimgysin@geemail.com.invalid wrote:
>anim8rfsk sent the following on 06/26/2017 at 12:22 PM:
>> "Jim G." wrote:
>>> anim8rfsk sent the following on 06/24/2017 at 04:44 PM:
>>>> "Jim G." wrote:
>>>>> Heh. No, Abrams did his damage in the discipline and dumbing-down
>>>>> departments. This latest fustercluck seems committed to doing its damage
>>>>> in the "diversity" and "passion" departments. Honestly, I wonder if J.J.
>>>>> is paying these idiots to provide a new target for the anger and
>>>>> hostility of Trek purists. All I know is that each time someone new
>>>>> comes along to "improve" Trek for a more "inclusive" audience, the worse
>>>>> the show gets.
>>>>
>>>> But don't you think this whole thing is staging, so that they can cry
>>>> 'racist' to *any* complaint about Star Trek STD?
>>>
>>> Are the people behind this thing competent or clever enough to pull off
>>> something like that? Because they're clearly not competent or clever
>>> enough to pull off a good Trek prequel. (I just saw a photo of a
>>> transporter room, and these people are consistent, if nothing else.)
>>
>> I saw that that was out there and didn't even bother to look at it. How
>> badly does *that* bode?
>>
>> Bear in mind that this is set in exactly the same year as THE CAGE, so
>> we *know* what stuff should look like.
>
>The entire mindset of people who do this sort of "reimagining" seems to
>be something along the lines of: "We know that ours will be better
>because we're making it all different!"
I thought it was merely their attempt to mark their own territory.
--
Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd
have to audit liberals & wire tap reporters' phones.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
