XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, rec.arts.tv
XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: Obveeus@aol.com
On 6/26/2017 5:28 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article , Obveeus
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/26/2017 3:12 PM, Jim G. wrote:
>>> Obveeus sent the following on 06/26/2017 at 01:16 PM:>
>>>> On 6/26/2017 1:22 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>> "Jim G." wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> anim8rfsk sent the following on 06/24/2017 at 04:44 PM:
>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>> "Jim G." wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But don't you think this whole thing is staging, so that they can cry
>>>>>>> 'racist' to *any* complaint about Star Trek STD?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are the people behind this thing competent or clever enough to pull off
>>>>>> something like that? Because they're clearly not competent or clever
>>>>>> enough to pull off a good Trek prequel. (I just saw a photo of a
>>>>>> transporter room, and these people are consistent, if nothing else.)
>>>>>
>>>>> I saw that that was out there and didn't even bother to look at it. How
>>>>> badly does *that* bode?
>>>>>
>>>>> Bear in mind that this is set in exactly the same year as THE CAGE, so
>>>>> we *know* what stuff should look like.
>>>>
>>>> The transporter preview image that has been shown is from the older
>>>> ship, not the more current ship (Discovery).
>>>
>>> Do you have a cite for that? Because everything that I saw when this
>>> came out made it clear that it was unknown if the image was of the older
>>> ship or the newer one.
>>
>> http://ew.com/tv/2017/06/22/star-trek-discovery-transporter-room/
>
>
> I note that the headline here is "Star Trek: Discovery first look at a
> groovy new transporter room."
>
> "Groovy"? How old are these people?
Approximately the same age as other STAR TREK viewers. ;-P
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
