Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 76,610 of 77,408    |
|    Lance Corporal Hammer Schultz to Wouter Valentijn    |
|    Re: Star Trek: Discovery star replies to    |
|    27 Jun 17 14:22:15    |
      XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, rec.arts.sf.tv       XPost: rec.arts.tv       From: starfist@gmail.invalid              On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 19:55:52 +0200, Wouter Valentijn wrote:              > Op 27-6-2017 om 00:33 schreef Lance Corporal Hammer Schultz:       >> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:21:41 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:       >>       >>> If memory serves, they made a big deal about having a female captain       >>       >> The PR push was annoying, but they didn't have to upend anything to       >> write the character. At least the timeline worked. Kirk says that       >> women are forbidden to captain a sharship 10 years after Discover       >> takes place. Not a problem for Voyager.       >>       >       > They did already had a female captain in Star Trek IV.       > And Rachel Garrett in 'Yesterday's Enterprise'.              Yes, I took "first female captain" to refer to the televised drame       itself having a primary cast female captain, not the canon timeline.              --       Hammer              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca