XPost: alt.tv.star-trek, alt.startrek, rec.arts.sf.tv   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: liam@valentijn.nu   
      
   Op 28-6-2017 om 19:54 schreef anim8rfsk:   
   > In article <5953e8b4$0$737$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,   
   >  Wouter Valentijn  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Op 28-6-2017 om 01:45 schreef anim8rfsk:   
   >>> In article ,   
   >>>  Doc O'Leary   wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> For your reference, records indicate that   
   >>>> Obveeus  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 6/26/2017 3:30 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:   
   >>>>>> In article , Obveeus    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> If you are going to rag on the show as being incompetent for changing   
   >>>>>>> the look of 'known things', how do you resolve the changes within the   
   >>>>>>> original cast era (such as the Klingon's face/head)?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> They explained that.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Yep...with hand-wavium silliness that negated the simple reality that   
   >>>>> the Trek film modified the look of the Klingons because the original   
   >>>>> look was too simplistic and lame for a film.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And yet the Vulcans got a pass.  Aren⤁t all of us humanoids supposed to   
   >>>> be closely related in Trek anyway?  Seems kind of racist that there   
   >>>> hasn't been a lot more interbreeding . . .   
   >>>   
   >>> But the Romulans got bumpy foreheads, even though nobody can tell them   
   >>> from the Vulcans ...   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Never liked that new Romulan look.   
   >   
   > It was just stupid.  How the Hell is Spock undercover on Romulus   
   > pretending to be a Romulan?   
   >   
      
   Yep. Plot hole the size of the Space Amoeba.   
      
   --   
   Wouter Valentijn www.j3v.net   
      
   "Be yourself no matter what they say"   
      
   Sting ("Englishman in New York")   
      
   liam=mail   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)