XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, rec.arts.tv   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: dtravel@sonic.net   
      
   On 6/30/2017 5:23 PM, Jim G. wrote:   
   > Dimensional Traveler sent the following on 06/30/2017 at 02:49 PM:   
   >> On 6/30/2017 12:36 PM, Jim G. wrote:   
   >>> Jim G. sent the following on 06/30/2017 at 02:33 PM:   
   >>>> Jerry Brown sent the following on 06/30/2017 at 12:18 PM:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The novelisation claimed that Scotty was trying to get Preston to   
   >>>>> sickbay but the elevator screwed up due to damage during Khan's   
   >>>>> attack.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That would have been a nice thing to see, too. It just seems   
   >>>> unfortunate   
   >>>> that, like the transporter business, a minute or two of time spent on   
   >>>> the pretty light shows couldn't have been used for this sort of   
   >>>> explanation instead.   
   >>>   
   >>> And yes, I'm sorta blurring my complaints about the first two movies,   
   >>> but that's because there's a common theme to it: visuals are nice, but   
   >>> not at the expense of head-scratching stuff that goes unexplained.   
   >>>   
   >> I think the studios view it as "if you can pay enough attention to the   
   >> story to find head-scratching stuff to complain about, the visuals   
   >> weren't doing their job."   
   >   
   > I'm starting to think that you might have a cynical perspective on this   
   > sort of thing. :)   
   >   
   You'd think that would keep me from being disappointed very often, yet   
   still I am.   
      
   --   
   Inquiring minds want to know while minds with a self-preservation   
   instinct are running screaming.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)