Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 76,686 of 77,408    |
|    Lance Corporal Hammer Schultz to Your Name    |
|    Re: [Article] Star Trek: Discovery ... i    |
|    30 Jul 17 07:37:06    |
      XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv       From: starfist@gmail.invalid              On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 16:43:55 +1200, Your Name wrote:              > Not from the moment Gene Roddenberry stopped having any official say.              Meh. Most of the best Trek didn't start coming until some time around       the third season of TNG. The two seasons of any Trek where Gene had       the most influence were the two worst seasons of, well, any Trek at       all -- 1 and 2 of TNG. He wasn't (couldn't?) pushing so much of the       worst ideas he had during TOS so there are a lot of great TOS       episodes, but this idea that Roddenberry was some kind of genius and       all good Trek came from his mind is just wrong.              Seems to me that regarding "real Trek" as just what Roddenberry did is       like saying "real Stargate" is just the original theatrical movie.       That may have started it, but the bulk of the franchise (or whatever       you call it) and the bulk of what people watch and like is very much       something else. It is what it is.              Obviously this new show is going to be junk, but the lack of Gene       Roddenberry has nothing to do with it.              --       Hammer              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca