XPost: alt.tv.star-trek, alt.startrek, rec.arts.sf.tv   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: daniel47@eternal-september.org   
      
   Doc O'Leary wrote:   
   > For your reference, records indicate that   
   > Obveeus  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 6/26/2017 3:30 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:   
   >>> In article , Obveeus    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> If you are going to rag on the show as being incompetent for changing   
   >>>> the look of 'known things', how do you resolve the changes within the   
   >>>> original cast era (such as the Klingon's face/head)?   
   >>>   
   >>> They explained that.   
   >>   
   >> Yep...with hand-wavium silliness that negated the simple reality that   
   >> the Trek film modified the look of the Klingons because the original   
   >> look was too simplistic and lame for a film.   
   >   
   > And yet the Vulcans got a pass.  Aren’t all of us humanoids supposed to   
   > be closely related in Trek anyway?  Seems kind of racist that there   
   > hasn't been a lot more interbreeding . . .   
   >   
   Well, with Vulcan's only getting horny once ever seven years .....! Or   
   has this "fact", like the Klingon foreheads, been altered in "modern"   
   Trek History??   
      
   --   
   Daniel   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)