Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 76,918 of 77,408    |
|    John Crane to The Horny Goat    |
|    Re: ... |
|    28 Nov 20 17:49:06    |
      From: john@localhost.net              On 11/28/2020 01:11 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:              > Presumably you would prefer her "mirror" alter-ego!       >               It's not a preference. It's a matter of leadership. Those laws were       written long before I was born. Education, training, emotional       stability, and intelligence are but the starting ingredients. Over time,       those can evolve into experience, maturity, confidence, and wisdom. All       needed for leadership.              I think it's a lack of understanding on the part of the writers. I've       seen other signs that they tend to see things only from the narrow       viewpoint of someone in the entertainment industry. There were instances        where they seem to think command is nothing more than an 'acting' job       one performs in front of the crew. And they regularly misinterpret       intelligence as education/training, or worse: 'general competence' in       all things. Perhaps in addition to science advisers, they should have       some military advisers as well.              Even in today's Navy, there is no way an Ensign who was a Cadet a year       ago, gets to be XO of a cruiser class ship. A PT boat maybe, but not a       ship the size of Discovery.              Of course, I could be wrong and the writers see all this. It could all       be a prelude to the court-martial of Saru, over his gross incompetence.       With Burnham's record, she should never have made XO. Now Tilly. Seems       like Saru has a long way to go as well.              I realize the writers are striving for a 'maverick type' like Kirk, in       the character of Burnham; but they are going overboard with it. Kirk       bucked authority and made calculated risks; and had an excellent sense       of intuition. Burnham, on the other hand, is just reckless. Perhaps       this is known to the writers as well. Recklessness as an emotional       rebound from the years of rigid Vulcan training. So she must come to       grips with herself as a human. That emotional instability should have       been detected by starfleet medical, and treated. You don't give an       unstable person command over others - ref 'Doomsday Machine' and       Commodore Decker.              my $0.02       -J              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca