Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 77,001 of 77,408    |
|    Your Name to pehache    |
|    Re: Does Star Trek Suck Now?    |
|    17 Sep 22 10:42:19    |
      From: YourName@YourISP.com              On 2022-09-16 19:04:17 +0000, pehache said:              > Le 13/09/2022 à 22:34, Your Name a écrit :       >>>>       >>>> After that it you get the ridiculous reboot garbage beginning -       >>>> "Enterprise" (note it doesn't even have "Star Trek" in the title being       >>>> a massive clue) and then followed by JarJar Abrams even worse movies.       >>>       >>> Enterprise is fully part of the historical ST and retains all the spirit       of ST.       >>       >> "Enterprise" was the first crappy reboot attempt.       >       > It's not a reboot it's a prequel.              It's a supposed prequel that in reality is just another reboot.              It's possible to be termed both, or in other examples it can be a       sequel and a reboot. They do it often. Simply saying it is set       earlier/later in the timeline doens't actually mean it fits with       existing content or does not make idiotic changes for the sake of it.       The up-coming new "Quantum Leap" is supposedly a sequel, but similarly       is in reality just a reboot. Another example was the "Knight Rider"       (using a crappy Mustang).                            >> The idiots making it even said they were making a "Star Trek" show to       >> try to appeal to non-Star Trek fans (hence leaving "Star Trek" out of       >> the title) ... what they ended up with was a show that didn't appeal to       >> most Star Trek fans either.       >       > Last time I asked, you have been unable to list any significant       > inconsistency between ENT and the other shows.              There are many lists available all over the internet of the problems       with "Enterprise", starting with the opening song and the lack of "Star       Trek" in the title, and going on from there (including the soft-porn       "oil me up, Scotty" decontamination scenes). Hell, even Beavis &       Butthead making it reportedly said they were making it for non-Star       Trek fans, which includes making idiotic changes.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca