From: pehache.7@gmail.com   
      
   Le 13/09/2022 à 22:34, Your Name a écrit :   
      
   >>>   
   >>> After that it you get the ridiculous reboot garbage beginning -   
   >>> "Enterprise" (note it doesn't even have "Star Trek" in the title   
   >>> being a massive clue) and then followed by JarJar Abrams even worse   
   >>> movies.   
   >>   
   >> Enterprise is fully part of the historical ST and retains all the   
   >> spirit of ST.   
   >   
   > "Enterprise" was the first crappy reboot attempt.   
      
   It's not a reboot it's a prequel.   
      
   > The idiots making it   
   > even said they were making a "Star Trek" show to try to appeal to   
   > non-Star Trek fans (hence leaving "Star Trek" out of the title) ... what   
   > they ended up with was a show that didn't appeal to most Star Trek fans   
   > either.   
      
   Last time I asked, you have been unable to list any significant   
   inconsistency between ENT and the other shows.   
      
      
   --   
   "...sois ouvert aux idées des autres pour peu qu'elles aillent dans le   
   même sens que les tiennes.", ST sur fr.bio.medecine   
   ST passe le mur du çon :    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)