From: YourName@YourISP.com
On 2022-09-13 18:08:17 +0000, pehache said:
> Le 24/08/2022 à 06:19, Your Name a écrit :
>> On 2022-08-24 04:24:37 +0000, DaveJohnson12@nomail. said:
>>
>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 12:39:51 -0700, Travoltron
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The answer is yes. Yes it does.
>>>
>>> I gave up on STD after 4 seasons. It's too political and the main
>>> character whispers most of her lines for dramatic effect. I don't like
>>> her acting.
>>> Season 1 of Peecard was alright asside from some of the woke aspects.
>>> Season 2 became more obnoxious with the producer forcing his politics
>>> on us. I hope I don't watch season 3.
>>> Strange New World varied between okay and not interesting. Having a
>>> man play the role of a slender woman will make some people happy. It's
>>> part of the producer's politics. I didn't appreciate it.
>>> CBS has mostly ruined Star Trek for many fans of the first 5 tv
>>> series.
>>
>> There's only four TV series:
>>
>> - Star Trek [the original show]
>> - Star Trek: The Next Generation
>> - Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
>> - Star Trek: Voyager
>>
>> Five, I guess, if you include the original animated "Star Trek" show.
>>
>> Plus of course the first few movies, although the 'save the whales' one
>> was rather silly.
>>
>> After that it you get the ridiculous reboot garbage beginning -
>> "Enterprise" (note it doesn't even have "Star Trek" in the title being
>> a massive clue) and then followed by JarJar Abrams even worse movies.
>
> Enterprise is fully part of the historical ST and retains all the spirit of
ST.
"Enterprise" was the first crappy reboot attempt. The idiots making it
even said they were making a "Star Trek" show to try to appeal to
non-Star Trek fans (hence leaving "Star Trek" out of the title) ...
what they ended up with was a show that didn't appeal to most Star Trek
fans either.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
