From: pehache.7@gmail.com
Le 25/09/2022 à 07:09, Your Name a écrit :
> On 2022-09-24, pehache wrote:
>> Le 23/09/2022 à 22:05, pehache a écrit :
>>>
>>> I don't claim that Entreprise is a perfect prequel. But given all the
>>> challenges to build a prequel, I find that they did really well.
>>
>> All the more if we take into account the pressure from the studio.
>>
>> Berman didn't want to start a new serie right after Voyager, he was
>> feeling that the audience was less demanding after 14 years non-stop and
>> that waiting a few years before starting a new one would be wise.
>
>
>
Weren't you supposed to killfile me???
> Ahhh, the old "franchise fatigue" nonsense to explain away the fact that
> they had no senisble ideas and simply wanted to do things they're own
> way via a moronic "reboot"
I'm still waiting for your list of significant inconsistencies that
would support your "reboot" theory (which until just looks like a flat
earth theory).
> (because of course they "know better" than
> Gene Roddenberry what Star Trek is "meant to be"). :-\
That's pure nonsense. Berman did handle and faithfully develop the
Roddenberry heritage during 14 years and 3 shows, and suddenly he wanted
to throw it away??
>
> Then the studio replaced them and JarJar Abrams made even more
> idiotic changes and garbage.
At least we can agree on that. But after all, JJA movies are claimed
reboots. Recent kurtzmanians shows are even more damaging, as they
contradicts events of the classic shows.
--
"...sois ouvert aux idées des autres pour peu qu'elles aillent dans le
même sens que les tiennes.", ST sur fr.bio.medecine
ST passe le mur du çon :
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
