XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: weberm@polaris.net
In article <106e416$3eg66$1@dont-email.me>, YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
> On 2025-07-30 21:04:11 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
>> BTR1701 wrote:
>>> "PoinsettDaliana96@outlook.com" wrote:
>>>> weberm@polaris.net wrote:
>>>>> https://youtu.be/xCxJroHiwvU?si=HhJLFQJmjqMHBUJ2
>>>>
>>>> Female Jem'Hadar.
>>>>
>>>> Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've never
>>>> watched DS9.
>>>
>>> The Jem'Hadar had no females. Or even males, since they didn't reproduce
>>> sexually. They were grown in vats by the Founders. The soldiers
>>> presented with masculine traits like strength and aggressiveness, but
>>> they were neither male nor female.
>>>
>>> So to both you and the writers of this mess of a STAR TREK show, right
>>> back atcha: Tell me you've never watched DS9 without telling me you've
>>> never watched DS9.
>>
>> Two words: frog DNA.
>>
>> OK, one word and one initialism, but you get my drift
>
>There is an *unofficial* fan story "Star Trek: Conflict" which does
>include the Jem'Hadar's first female, created by a genetic mutation
>before fertilization due to being infected with human DNA.
Ugh, fan fiction.
> Jek'Kralija is the first Jem'Hadar female.
>
Kralija's birth came about because a hatching pod of several
Jem'Hadar was infected by humanoid DNA.
Holy butake, Batman!
A group of Jem'Hadar who escaped the Dominion's rule because
of the appearance of "conscientious behavior"
Tell me you've never watched Star Trek without saying you nevber watched it.
Jek does not possess mammary glands. Since Jem'Hadar are grown in
eggs, she lays eggs (at will, and not on any cycle).
No, they're grown in birthing vats and they're not reptilian.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
