Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 77,260 of 77,408    |
|    Ubiquitous to thetruemelissa@gmail.com    |
|    Re: AI/LLM reviews of STNG - Darmok    |
|    10 Sep 25 04:30:49    |
      XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.startrek.fandom, rec.arts.startrek.misc       XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, can.arts.sf       From: weberm@polaris.net              thetruemelissa@gmail.com wrote:       > weberm@polaris.net delivered unto us this message:       >> thetruemelissa@gmail.com wrote:       >>> anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:              >>>> You couldn?t possibly develop a language like that naturally. You'd       >>>> have to start with a real language and then change it just to be       >>>> annoying.       >>>       >>>I'm not so sure about "couldn't possibly." They would need to learn the       >>>stories somehow, but (according to the fan wiki) the official position       >>>is that they *mostly* speak in metaphor. Children presumably learn some       >>>basics in plainer language, which really should have been tried with       >>>Picard, but a highly metaphorical species might not have thought of it.       >>       >> It's been discussed before (and better), but you cannot have a language       >> that is _entirely_ memes.       >       >That's probably why the "mostly" part is in there.              It might as well be "entirely" if you're unable to explain the meme       you're using.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca