XPost: rec.arts.sf.movies, rec.arts.movies.current-films   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   On 2025-11-15 16:11:58 +0000, Paul S Person said:   
   > On Sat, 15 Nov 2025 13:40:28 +1300, Your Name    
   > wrote:   
   >>   
   >> No actual details, but "a completely new take in the Star Trek   
   >> universe>and is not connected to any previous or current television   
   >> series,>movie, or prior movie development projects" ... that's usually   
   >> an>incredibly bad sign that turns out to be a a ridiculous   
   >> "reboot">attempt and/or an ill-fitting drivel cash-in exercise.  :-(   
   >   
   > Well, we already had an incredibly bad reboot [1], so one more won't   
   > make any never-mind.   
      
   Except every idiotic reboot adds its own new level of inconsistency and   
   silliness, so further diluting and confusing the franchise.  :-(   
      
   You just have to look at the comic books. They've have so many changes   
   over the years that now nobody know what "Batman", "Superman",   
   "Spider-man", etc. actually are any more.   
      
      
      
   > [1] Which did, however, manage to show what "wrath" looks like,   
   > confirming that the "wrath" of Khan was more of a temper tantrum. Or a   
   > hissy-fit.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)