Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.current    |    New Star Trek shows, movies and books    |    77,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 77,346 of 77,408    |
|    The True Melissa to All    |
|    Re: What Did You Watch? 2026-01-17 (Satu    |
|    20 Jan 26 07:45:26    |
      XPost: rec.arts.tv       From: thetruemelissa@gmail.com              Verily, in article <10kmnie$rp44$2@dont-email.me>, did atropos@mac.com       deliver unto us this message:       > Why does the ship need to land and dock? They not only have transporters,       they       > have the new-fangled transporters that are built into their com badges and       > which apparently are psychically linked to the person's mind because they're       > all constantly just slapping their lapels and somehow the thing knows exactly       > where to beam them.       >              If Trek were more realistic, I could see it. It would use less energy to       dock or launch the mobile part once in a while than to constantly       disintegrate and reconstitute everyone. Given that Trek seems to be in a       fantasy world of unlimited energy, though, then it does seem pointless.              --       The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio       United States of America - North America - Earth       Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group       Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca