XPost: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM
On 26/11/2025 09:23, solar penguin wrote:
>
> The True loon twisted himself into loops:
>
>> On 25/11/2025 12:19, solar penguin wrote:
>>>
>>> Daniel70 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/11/2025 3:42 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> and with laser reflectors, moon buggies, American flags, golf balls,
>>>>> golf clubs, and rocket stages in exactly the same positions they
>>>>> were before, and with exactly the same features?
>>>>
>>>> In another Dimension .... YES.
>>>
>>> Who says the laser reflectors, moon buggies, etc. were still
>>> in the same positions as before? I don’t remember that in the
>>> episode.
>>
>> Because that's where they are now
>
> But will they continue to be there after 2049?
>
We were shown images of the face of the re-formed moon with the exact
same craters in the exact same places they are now.
>> and where they have always been.
>
> But will they continue to be there after 2049?
>
According to Kill the Moon they will, even after the moon has been
destroyed after 90% of it's mass flew into space, and then came back
again out of nothing.
>> If they were so much as a millimetre out of place then the whole
>> world would have been completely unrecognisable.
>>
>
> I think the other events of the episode would change the world
> far more than the position of some lunar junk.
Wrong. You demonstrate that you have no understanding of Chaos Theory.
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> DON'T BE A FOOL! What happened to Liz Shaw who was based on the moon
>>>>> during this time?
>>>>
>>>> In another Dimension .... YES.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Who says she was on the moon when that happened? Once
>>> again, I don’t remember seeing her in the episode.
>>>
>>> Is Aggy making stuff up again?
>>
>> RTD said she was based on the moon. Why didn't the Doctor give a stuff
>> about what might have happened to her?
>>
>
> Did RTD specifically say that Liz Shaw was on the moon during
> the specific events of this specific episode?
>
He said she was based on the Moon during the Sarah Jane Adventures.
> And if he did, how did he know? This was long after he left the
> show. His personal opinion doesn’t change anything.
It's mentioned at the end of the SJA episode he wrote featuring Matt Smith.
>
>>>
>>> With all the real problems in that episode, why make up
>>> fake ones?
>>>
>>
>> It's not a fake one. Any episode where you gain wight in free fall
>> instead of becoming weightless violates the laws of physics, and
>> therefore this episode is not part of Doctor Who.
>
> That’s a _different_ problem. It has nothing to do with lunar junk
> or Liz Shaw.
It's still a problem with the episode which means that nothing from that
episode onwards can be considered to have actually happened. There is no
possible way to suspend disbelief.
>
> (It’s also another fake problem. Doctor Who has been violating
> physics ever since that police box turned out to be bigger on
> the inside! Why start making a fuss about it now?)
>
The reason why the TARDIS is bigger on the inside has been explained
multiple times including at the start of The Robots of Death, therefore
there is suspension of disbelief. It also does not affect anything on
Earth.
There was no explanation whatsoever for why the laws of gravity and
conservation of energy were systematically violated in Kill the Moon.
Why wasn't the Earth thrown out of orbit and ripped apart by earthquakes
and huge tidal waves and tsunamis when 90% of the mass of the moon flew
away?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." --William Shatner
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
