From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article <10g6l06$a0k0$1@dont-email.me>,   
   Daniel70   wrote:   
   >On 24/11/2025 10:13 am, Dumas Walker wrote:   
   >>> On 23/11/2025 1:51 am, StanWeiss wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>> Definitions from Oxford Languages bink.y /.biNGk./ nountrademark   
   >>>> in US noun: binky; plural noun: binkies; noun: binkie   
   >>   
   >>>> a pacifier.   
   >>   
   >>> Sorry! Is that "a pacifier" as in a "baby's dummy"??   
   >>   
   >> I think it is, i.e. something for a baby to suck on besides their   
   >> thumbs, a bottle, or a teet.   
   >   
   >I was gunna post "WHAT?? Don't baby's suck on Boobs any more??" but then   
   >I realised that was probably what you meant by "teet"!! Although   
   >WikiDiff wants it spelt 'teat'.   
   >>   
   >>> So am I calling Binky a "baby's dummy"?? Seems appropriate!   
   >>   
   >> I am actually surprised that binky is trademarked in the US   
   >   
   >Or is it just the Binky claims "Binky" is trademarked??   
   >   
   >> unless it is a brand name.  The only people I have ever heard call a   
   >> pacifier a "binky" are usually not of US origin.   
   >   
   >Binky is a Pom by birth!   
    ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted   
      
   >   
   >> Here in the USA I have only ever heard them called "pacifier" and   
   >> "passee" by natives.   
   >>   
   >> * SLMR 2.1a * Trespassers will be shot, survivors will be shot   
   >> again!   
   >>   
   >--   
   >Daniel70   
      
      
   --   
   Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca   
   Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!   
   Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;   
   All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)