XPost: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho   
   From: agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM   
      
   On 28/11/2025 09:59, solar imbecile wrote:   
   >   
   > The True Doctor wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 26/11/2025 09:23, solar imbecile wrote:   
   >   
   > You forgot to change it to ‘solar imbecile’! Please try harder!   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>> The True Doctor wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 25/11/2025 12:19, solar penguin wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Who says the laser reflectors, moon buggies, etc. were   
   >>>>> still in the same positions as before? I don’t remember that   
   >>>>> in the episode.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Because that's where they are now   
   >>>   
   >>> But will they continue to be there after 2049?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> We were shown images of the face of the re-formed moon with the exact   
   >> same craters in the exact same places they are now.   
   >>   
   >   
   > And that is a real problem with the episode. The craters aren’t   
   > a natural part of the moon, but the result of meteors hitting it.   
   >   
   > You should’ve gone with that instead of nonsense about NASA’s   
   > lunar junk.   
      
   I already said that when I stated that the moon looked exactly the same   
   as it did before. Learn to read you infant. Meteor craters are not   
   something man made. Laser reflectors, rocket stages, and moon buggies   
   are, and therefore impossible to reproduce without human intervention.   
   >   
   >>>> If they were so much as a millimetre out of place then the whole   
   >>>> world would have been completely unrecognisable.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> I think the other events of the episode would change the world   
   >>> far more than the position of some lunar junk.   
   >>   
   >> Wrong. You demonstrate that you have no understanding of Chaos Theory.   
   >>   
   >   
   > You demonstrate that you have no understanding of your own   
   > posts. Further down you ask: “Why wasn't the Earth thrown out   
   > of orbit and ripped apart by earthquakes and huge tidal waves   
   > and tsunamis when 90% of the mass of the moon flew away?”   
   >   
   > That would have a _much_ bigger effect than NASA no longer   
   > knowing where its moon junk is!   
      
   You demonstrate that you have no understanding of anything you stupid   
   infant and have no idea of how to reason. I listed all the reasons why   
   the story was totally undeliverable. I didn't write them down for you to   
   divert people's attention form the subject by turning it into a   
   competition to decide which was the best you degenerate. Address the   
   question moron. Any of those reasons is enough to totally invalidate the   
   imbecilic story which provides no explanation for any of them.   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>> Did RTD specifically say that Liz Shaw was on the moon during   
   >>> the specific events of this specific episode?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> He said she was based on the Moon during the Sarah Jane Adventures.   
   >>   
   >>> And if he did, how did he know? This was long after he left the   
   >>> show. His personal opinion doesn’t change anything.   
   >>   
   >> It's mentioned at the end of the SJA episode he wrote featuring Matt Smith.   
   >>   
   >   
   > That was around 2010. ‘Kill the Moon’ is set in 2049. This gives   
   > Liz nearly 40 years to return from the moon and die of old age   
   > or whatever.   
      
   There's still a moon base there. What happened to it?   
      
   >   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> With all the real problems in that episode, why make up   
   >>>>> fake ones?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It's not a fake one. Any episode where you gain wight in free fall   
   >>>> instead of becoming weightless violates the laws of physics, and   
   >>>> therefore this episode is not part of Doctor Who.   
   >>>   
   >>> That’s a _different_ problem. It has nothing to do with lunar junk   
   >>> or Liz Shaw.   
   >>   
   >> It's still a problem with the episode   
   >   
   > And you should’ve gone with that instead of your made-up   
   > fake problems.   
      
   I went with all of them you imbecilic, stupid, degenerate moron, since   
   all are equally valid failings.   
      
   >   
   >> which means that nothing from that   
   >> episode onwards can be considered to have actually happened.   
   >   
   > No, it means that this was a disappointing episode. In a show   
   > that’s lasted as long as Doctor Who, there are always bound to   
   > be some disappointing episodes, just by the law of averages.   
   >   
      
   This episode was totally inexcusable.   
      
   >> There is no possible way to suspend disbelief.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Your imagination is too small. I can think of at least two ways   
   > to do it.   
      
   Only if you're an imbecile could you possibly suspend disbelief at that   
   episode.   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>> (It’s also another fake problem. Doctor Who has been violating   
   >>> physics ever since that police box turned out to be bigger on   
   >>> the inside! Why start making a fuss about it now?)   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> The reason why the TARDIS is bigger on the inside has been explained   
   >> multiple times including at the start of The Robots of Death, therefore   
   >> there is suspension of disbelief. It also does not affect anything on   
   >> Earth.   
   >>   
   >   
   > So a bit of handwaving technobabble years after the problem is   
   > enough to solve it.   
      
   It was already commented on from the very first episode and thus   
   acknowledged as a technological problem. None of the violation of basic   
   physics in Kill the Moon were ever commented on. Learn you to write   
   science fiction you moron.   
      
   >   
   > If a future episode has a line saying that space dragons’ ovaries   
   > extend into a parallel dimension, would that be enough to bring   
   > ‘Kill the Moon’ and everything that follows back into canon?   
   >   
      
   No. That does not fix the violation of Newton's first law which was made   
   into a stupid infantile plot element or the return of the laser   
   reflectors, moon buggies, rocket stages, and craters to the places and   
   shapes and places they were before the moon cracked open or the fact   
   that the Earth was not thrown out of its orbit and completely devastated,   
      
      
   >> Why wasn't the Earth thrown out of orbit and ripped apart by earthquakes   
   >> and huge tidal waves and tsunamis when 90% of the mass of the moon flew   
   >> away?   
   >   
   > Yes, that’s a real problem. You should’ve gone with that instead   
   > of Liz Shaw and NASA’s junk.   
   >   
      
   I went with all of them you stupid, infantile, degenerate, moronic,   
   imbecile. You ain't fooling anyone who has intelligence trying to worm   
   your way out.   
      
   --   
   The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw   
      
   "To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it   
   stands for." --William Shatner   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)