XPost: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
In article <10gbug4$2ar8e$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor wrote:
>On 28/11/2025 09:59, solar imbecile wrote:
>>
>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> On 26/11/2025 09:23, solar imbecile wrote:
>>
>> You forgot to change it to ‘solar imbecile’! Please try harder!
>>
>>>>
>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 25/11/2025 12:19, solar penguin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who says the laser reflectors, moon buggies, etc. were
>>>>>> still in the same positions as before? I don’t remember that
>>>>>> in the episode.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because that's where they are now
>>>>
>>>> But will they continue to be there after 2049?
>>>>
>>>
>>> We were shown images of the face of the re-formed moon with the exact
>>> same craters in the exact same places they are now.
>>>
>>
>> And that is a real problem with the episode. The craters aren’t
>> a natural part of the moon, but the result of meteors hitting it.
>>
>> You should’ve gone with that instead of nonsense about NASA’s
>> lunar junk.
>
>I already said that when I stated that the moon looked exactly the same
>as it did before. Learn to read you infant. Meteor craters are not
>something man made. Laser reflectors, rocket stages, and moon buggies
>are, and therefore impossible to reproduce without human intervention.
>>
>>>>> If they were so much as a millimetre out of place then the whole
>>>>> world would have been completely unrecognisable.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think the other events of the episode would change the world
>>>> far more than the position of some lunar junk.
>>>
>>> Wrong. You demonstrate that you have no understanding of Chaos Theory.
>>>
>>
>> You demonstrate that you have no understanding of your own
>> posts. Further down you ask: “Why wasn't the Earth thrown out
>> of orbit and ripped apart by earthquakes and huge tidal waves
>> and tsunamis when 90% of the mass of the moon flew away?”
>>
>> That would have a _much_ bigger effect than NASA no longer
>> knowing where its moon junk is!
>
>You demonstrate that you have no understanding of anything you stupid
>infant and have no idea of how to reason. I listed all the reasons why
>the story was totally undeliverable. I didn't write them down for you to
>divert people's attention form the subject by turning it into a
>competition to decide which was the best you degenerate. Address the
>question moron. Any of those reasons is enough to totally invalidate the
>imbecilic story which provides no explanation for any of them.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Did RTD specifically say that Liz Shaw was on the moon during
>>>> the specific events of this specific episode?
>>>>
>>>
>>> He said she was based on the Moon during the Sarah Jane Adventures.
>>>
>>>> And if he did, how did he know? This was long after he left the
>>>> show. His personal opinion doesn’t change anything.
>>>
>>> It's mentioned at the end of the SJA episode he wrote featuring Matt Smith.
>>>
>>
>> That was around 2010. ‘Kill the Moon’ is set in 2049. This gives
>> Liz nearly 40 years to return from the moon and die of old age
>> or whatever.
>
>There's still a moon base there. What happened to it?
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With all the real problems in that episode, why make up
>>>>>> fake ones?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not a fake one. Any episode where you gain wight in free fall
>>>>> instead of becoming weightless violates the laws of physics, and
>>>>> therefore this episode is not part of Doctor Who.
>>>>
>>>> That’s a _different_ problem. It has nothing to do with lunar junk
>>>> or Liz Shaw.
>>>
>>> It's still a problem with the episode
>>
>> And you should’ve gone with that instead of your made-up
>> fake problems.
>
>I went with all of them you imbecilic, stupid, degenerate moron, since
>all are equally valid failings.
>
>>
>>> which means that nothing from that
>>> episode onwards can be considered to have actually happened.
>>
>> No, it means that this was a disappointing episode. In a show
>> that’s lasted as long as Doctor Who, there are always bound to
>> be some disappointing episodes, just by the law of averages.
>>
>
>This episode was totally inexcusable.
>
>>> There is no possible way to suspend disbelief.
>>>
>>
>> Your imagination is too small. I can think of at least two ways
>> to do it.
>
>Only if you're an imbecile could you possibly suspend disbelief at that
>episode.
>>
>>>>
>>>> (It’s also another fake problem. Doctor Who has been violating
>>>> physics ever since that police box turned out to be bigger on
>>>> the inside! Why start making a fuss about it now?)
>>>>
>>>
>>> The reason why the TARDIS is bigger on the inside has been explained
>>> multiple times including at the start of The Robots of Death, therefore
>>> there is suspension of disbelief. It also does not affect anything on
>>> Earth.
>>>
>>
>> So a bit of handwaving technobabble years after the problem is
>> enough to solve it.
>
>It was already commented on from the very first episode and thus
>acknowledged as a technological problem. None of the violation of basic
>physics in Kill the Moon were ever commented on. Learn you to write
>science fiction you moron.
>
>>
>> If a future episode has a line saying that space dragons’ ovaries
>> extend into a parallel dimension, would that be enough to bring
>> ‘Kill the Moon’ and everything that follows back into canon?
>>
>
>No. That does not fix the violation of Newton's first law which was made
>into a stupid infantile plot element or the return of the laser
>reflectors, moon buggies, rocket stages, and craters to the places and
>shapes and places they were before the moon cracked open or the fact
>that the Earth was not thrown out of its orbit and completely devastated,
>
>
>>> Why wasn't the Earth thrown out of orbit and ripped apart by earthquakes
>>> and huge tidal waves and tsunamis when 90% of the mass of the moon flew
>>> away?
>>
>> Yes, that’s a real problem. You should’ve gone with that instead
>> of Liz Shaw and NASA’s junk.
>>
>
>I went with all of them you stupid, infantile, degenerate, moronic,
>imbecile. You ain't fooling anyone who has intelligence trying to worm
>your way out.
>
Such is the imbecile.
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." --William Shatner
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
