Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.drwho    |    Discussion about Dr. Who    |    510,969 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 509,171 of 510,969    |
|    Don Macron to All    |
|    Dot and Bubble analysis    |
|    01 Dec 25 17:08:49    |
      From: notemmanuel@mail.fr              What are your opinions about this episode?              My understanding this was originally intended to be a Matt Smith and       Karen Gillan episode, set during season 6, and it was later adapted for       the Disney reboot. That means that the original plot twist would have       involved not racism, but xenophobia/tribalism.              It's clear the Doctor was more pushy and condescending, while his       companion took a softer approach. This explains why Lindy reacted       differently to them. Plus, the Doctor committed the horrible "crime" of       bumping Ricky September off her feed during her morning routine.              Of course, in the Gatwa version, the conventional wisdom is that the       audience is supposed to *infer* that all the Finetimers are horribly       racist people and every interaction between them and the Doctor was       "racist". However, this is never made explicit in the episode itself.       All of the dialogue would still work just as functionally if they were       rejecting the Doctor for the same reasons they would have in the Smith       script (he's an Outsider, he's older, he's not human).              Putting the tacked on racism angle aside, it's ironic that RTD chose to       parody and lampoon an entire age demographic as being vapid and shallow,       especially when the show was supposedly trying to appeal to that       demographic.              That said, the episode raises some interesting questions which are       possibly beyond the intellect of the specific audience that it was       pandering to. Particularly, did Lindey become "irredeemable" when she       directed the phantasm ball to kill Ricky instead of her? It's easy for       those who've never actually been in a life-or-death situation to condemn       her, but how many people can honestly say they know for 100% sure they       wouldn't have reacted the same way in a split second while in full Fight       or Flight mode?              How much of her behavior at the end of the episode was informed by her       shock/PTSD/denial/guilt over what had just happened to her?              In almost every review I've read, people seem to be cheering on the idea       that all of the young people in this episode died horrible deaths. It's       very strange that a Doctor Who story would intend to provoke this type       of reaction in its audience. The episode itself does not endorse this       view, but it was left open ended as to what actually happened to them       (although the Doctor says/believes they'll die, but the audience was       never shown why he's so confident of that).              I have a theory that the overrideing reason why many viewers wished       horrible deaths upon the Finetimers is because they saw a lot of       themselves in them, and it hit too close to home.              In retrospect, this felt like it was a "setup" episode, to be followed       up later with a possible twist of Lindey either being redeemed or       becoming a new recurring villain. There was also still the loose end of       how Brewster survived, even though his name was towards the beginning of       the list. What little we saw of him reminded me of Conrad.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca