From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
In article ,
Blueshirt wrote:
>solar penguin wrote:
>
>>
>> Blueshirt blindsided the loon:
>>
>> > The True Doctor wrote:
>> >>
>> >> What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
>> >> place then?
>> >
>> > You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.
>> >
>> > It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.
>>
>> And if Barclay’s family weren’t introduced before they become
>> important in episode four or five, Aggy would be complaining
>> that we should’ve seen them before!
>
>The fact Barclay's family were a large part of the focus in
>the second episode, and not just put away somewhere for the
>duration of the story, clearly means they will play a part in
>the proceedings... beyond Barclay and his kid having a cuddle
>on the sofa in the hotel room or them getting blown away by
>rubbish! So yeah, they couldn't just be thrown in for the
>episode five climax.
>
>As always, they are there for a reason. Aggy should be aware
>of how stories work. He is our resident professor of literature
>after all. Plus, we all know RTD likes his soap opera moments
>too. So my money is on Barclay and his missus reconciling at
>the end too, making Kirby happier than a fish lizard in water.
>
>> He’s never happppy
>
>AGA does get a bit carried away with his angst at times.
>
>I mean, over twenty paragraphs for a review of just two
>episodes! Even the journalist writing the review in The
>Guardian was more concise!!! ;-)
the RTD anti-fans are vocal.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
