From: srweiss1@comcast.net
On 1/7/2026 12:00 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <10jm15q$2r67c$2@solani.org>,
> StanWeiss wrote:
>> On 1/7/2026 9:59 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <10jldsv$iqhk$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel70 wrote:
>>>> On 7/01/2026 2:24 am, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>> Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
>>>>>>>> You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
>>>>>>>> doesn't count!
>>>>>>> Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
>>>>>> I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types are
>>>>>> walking contradictions to begin with.
>>>>> Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
>>>> If AI IS "contradictionry", it is because it is DUMB .... only as
>>>> intelligent as those that programmed it.
>>> So what do You make of
>>>
>>>
>>> Is the Bible Fiction?
>>>
>>> Google Gemini
>>>
>>> The Bible is not a single book, but a library containing many
>>> different genres. It is rarely classified as "fiction" in the
>>> modern sense, though its contents vary in historical accuracy.
>>>
>>> LITERARY GENRES
>>> The Bible includes poetry (Psalms), wisdom literature (Proverbs),
>>> apocalyptic visions (Revelation), and legal codes (Leviticus).
>>> These are distinct from both "history" and "fiction."
>>>
>>> HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
>>> Many parts of the Bible, such as the Books of Kings or the
>>> Gospels, are intended as historical accounts. Archeology has
>>> confirmed various figures, locations, and events mentioned in
>>> these texts, such as the existence of King David or the
>>> Babylonian Exile.
>>>
>>> MYTH AND ALLEGORY
>>> Scholars often describe the early chapters of Genesis (Creation,
>>> Noah's Ark) as "mythopoeic." This doesn't necessarily mean
>>> "false" to a believer, but suggests the stories are intended
>>> to convey theological truths rather than scientific data.
>>>
>>> PARABLES
>>> The New Testament contains "parables" told by Jesus. These are
>>> explicitly fictional stories (like the Prodigal Son) used to
>>> illustrate moral or spiritual lessons.
>>>
>>> FAITH VS. HISTORICITY
>>> For many, the Bible is "Inspired Word," a category that
>>> transcends the fiction/non-fiction binary. For secular
>>> historians, it is a foundational cultural text that mixes
>>> genuine oral tradition, historical record, and folklore.
>>>
>>> In summary, calling the Bible "fiction" is generally seen as
>>> reductive, as it ignores the text's role as a historical
>>> document and its intent to record the heritage of a people.
>>>
>>> ChatGPT
>>>
>>> Whether the Bible is “fiction” depends on **perspective and
definition**.
>>>
>>> **From a religious perspective:**
>>> Believers generally hold that the Bible is **sacred scripture** - divinely
>>> inspired or revealed - containing spiritual truth, moral teaching, and,
>>> for many, real historical events.
>>>
>>> **From an academic / literary perspective:**
>>> Scholars view the Bible as a **collection of texts** written over many
>>> centuries, containing **multiple genres**:
>>>
>>> * History and historiography
>>> * Poetry and wisdom literature
>>> * Law codes
>>> * Prophecy
>>> * Letters
>>> * Parable and allegory
>>>
>>> Some parts are studied as **historical narratives**, others as
**theological
>>> storytelling**, and some as **symbolic or mythic literature**. In this
>>> context, certain passages are treated as non-literal or symbolic rather
>>> than factual reportage.
>>>
>>> **From a historical-critical perspective:**
>>> Historians assess individual books case by case. Some events, people,
>>> and places are supported by external evidence; others are debated
>>> or considered theological constructions.
>>>
>>> **Short answer:**
>>> The Bible is **not simply fiction**, but neither is it a single,
>>> modern history book. It is a **complex religious library** whose
>>> interpretation depends on faith, scholarship, and purpose.
>>>
>>> If you want, I can explain how specific books (Genesis, Gospels,
>>> Revelation) are usually classified.
>>>
>>> Is the Holy Bible Historically factual?
>>>
>>> Google Gemini
>>>
>>> The historicity of the Bible varies significantly between the
>>> Old and New Testaments and across different time periods.
>>>
>>> AREAS OF HISTORICAL CORROBORATION
>>> Archeology has confirmed the existence of many biblical figures
>>> and events, particularly from the later periods:
>>>
>>> The House of David: The Tel Dan Stele (9th century BCE)
>>> mentions the "House of David," supporting his existence.
>>>
>>> The Babylonian Exile: Records from Babylon and the Cyrus
>>> Cylinder confirm the conquest of Jerusalem and the return
>>> of the Jewish people.
>>>
>>> New Testament Figures: Secular Roman and Jewish historians
>>> like Tacitus and Josephus confirm the existence of Jesus
>>> of Nazareth, John the Baptist, and James.
>>>
>>> THE "LACK OF EVIDENCE" CHALLENGE
>>> Certain foundational events lack contemporary archeological or
>>> extrabiblical evidence:
>>>
>>> The Exodus: There is currently no Egyptian record or
>>> archeological evidence in the Sinai Peninsula of a mass
>>> migration of millions of people as described in Exodus.
>>>
>>> The United Monarchy: While David existed, the scale of
>>> his empire and the splendor of Solomon's Jerusalem are
>>> debated; archeology suggests a more modest highland chiefdom.
>>>
>>> SCIENTIFIC VS. HISTORICAL FACT
>>> Events such as the Great Flood or the six-day creation are
>>> generally viewed by scientists and modern historians as
>>> theological narratives or adaptations of earlier Near Eastern
>>> myths (like the Epic of Gilgamesh) rather than literal
>>> geological history.
>>>
>>> THE GOSPELS AND ORAL TRADITION
>>> The Gospels were written 40 to 70 years after Jesus' death.
>>> While they reflect the geography and politics of 1st-century
>>> Judea accurately, they are written as "testimony" to inspire
>>> faith, meaning they prioritize spiritual meaning over
>>> the detached objectivity expected of modern history.
>>>
>>> CONCLUSION
>>> Historians generally view the Bible as a "foundational
>>> history"—it captures the real cultural memory and political
>>> shifts of the Levant, but it frames those events through
>>> a specific religious lens that may exaggerate or
>>> reinterpret details for spiritual purposes.
>>>
>>> ChatGPT
>>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
