XPost: rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.sf.science   
   From: jclarkeusenet@cox.net   
      
   In article , robban@clubtelco.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 14/01/2014 8:51 am, J. Clarke wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > > droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> In article ,   
   > >>   Greg Goss  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>> Doc O'Leary  wrote:   
   > >>>> Greg Goss  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>> Building a virtual train out of self-driving bits?  That's kinda like   
   > >>>>> building an internet by making self-driving packets.  It'll never   
   > >>>>> work.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I don't even understand the analogy you're trying to make.  Self-driving   
   > >>>> cars *are* a virtual train.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> It's sarcasm.   
   > >>   
   > >> Then it just wasn't very good.  I never said that self-driving   
   > >> technology *couldn't* work (it most certainly can), just that it was a   
   > >> poor solution to a problem that was solved centuries ago.   
   > >   
   > > However if everyone rides horses then you have a horse-poop problem, and   
   > > horses have to be fed even when not in use.   
   >   
   > In fact, towards the end of the 19th century the traffic situation with   
   > horse-drawn vehicles was as bad if not worse than today. There are a few   
   > photographs and drawings around of grid lock in London and elsewhere.   
   > Road accidents were also very common. No speedometers or speed limits   
   > back then.   
      
   And Christopher Reeve would have told you that horses are not   
   particularly safe.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)