Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.misc    |    Science fiction lovers' newsgroup    |    3,290 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,208 of 3,290    |
|    Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) to Your Name    |
|    Re: cases where SF has predicted scienti    |
|    14 Jan 14 15:32:39    |
      XPost: rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.sf.science       From: seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com              On 1/14/14 3:22 PM, Your Name wrote:              > Electric cars powered by plugging them into a socket will never really       > be a workable option for most people.               Especially if you want to recharge them FAST, as you're then requiring       wattage that no ordinary residential neighborhood could manage to       handle. Overnight works for commuters. Not sure how the energy costs       work out.                     > That's why most manufacturers are       > already moving towards hydrogen powered cars, which are a much more       > senisible option since they are refuelled quickly in the same basic       > manner as a petrol / diesel vehicle. It is also much easier to change       > petrol / diesel pumps over time to be pumps for hydrogen car refuelling       > or add more pumps.       >               Hydrogen's a terrible choice at the moment. You need to (inefficiently)       use electricity to generate it, then you need either SUPER high pressure       storage for it (which means that even leaving combustibility aside, it's       a bomb) or some of the somewhat-less-high-pressure absorptive materials       which reduce its energy density effectively. It leaks easily (tiny       molecule), requires high-pressure transfer, and it's not THAT easy to       convert "dump liquid down a hole" storage and fill-up machinery to "send       highly compressed gas into a compressed gas tank".               If you're gonna use electricity to manufacture your fuel, why not       manufacture gasoline? We already have the infrastructure to store and       transport it, we're intimately familiar with its hazards and how to       control them, it's got awesome energy density, and you don't have to       convert 250 million cars over in order to use it.               Just build a bunch more generating stations. Preferably nuclear, maybe       thorium cycle if they get the bugs out.                            --        Sea Wasp        /^\        ;;;        Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:       http://seawasp.livejournal.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca