home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.misc      Science fiction lovers' newsgroup      3,290 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,337 of 3,290   
   Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) to Robert Bannister   
   Re: cases where SF has predicted scienti   
   16 Jan 14 07:18:14   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.sf.science   
   From: seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com   
      
   On 1/15/14 10:32 PM, Robert Bannister wrote:   
   > On 16/01/2014 2:02 am, Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote:   
   >> On 1/15/14 12:54 PM, Doc O'Leary wrote:   
   >>> In article ,   
   >>>   "sna"  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> "J. Clarke"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:MPG.2d3b71dbee74782498a35e@news.newsguy.com...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> When the train can take me from my garage to my office and stop off   
   >>>>> for   
   >>>>> groceries on the way home, all on my schedule, without my having to   
   >>>>> walk   
   >>>>> several blocks in the snow at each end or make several transfers, get   
   >>>>> back to me.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yeah, that one is never going to happen, even with the pod system.   
   >>>   
   >>> Only a fool would imagine that's a good idea in the first place.  Part   
   >>> of the beauty of a "pod" system is that it can not only abstract a   
   >>> transporter, but a replicator as well.  You need groceries?  You push a   
   >>> few buttons and it all gets sent *to* you!  Hell, we already have   
   >>> approximations of this with companies like Amazon.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>      Not even vaguely close. I do my shopping in person because there is   
   >> no way I'm trusting some guy I don't know to check every piece of   
   >> produce and make sure it's in good shape, and even if I did, do I trust   
   >> the shipping company or delivery people? No. The remote location   
   >> ordering approach is great for things like books, or gadgets, but not   
   >> for fresh food.   
   >   
   > Same with clothes. I have bought clothing on line, but I much prefer to   
   > be able to feel the material and to try the garment on.   
   >   
      
   	Indeed. Exacerbated by the fact that a lot of clothing companies have   
   non-standardized their sizes over the years, so an XXL in one is an XL   
   in another, and a 36 waist in one is a 38 waist in another. (yes, one of   
   them's effectively lying)   
      
      
      
      
   --   
                         Sea Wasp   
                           /^\   
                           ;;;	   
   Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com  Blog:   
   http://seawasp.livejournal.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca