Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.misc    |    Science fiction lovers' newsgroup    |    3,290 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,341 of 3,290    |
|    Bernard Peek to Doc O'Leary    |
|    Re: cases where SF has predicted scienti    |
|    16 Jan 14 15:36:53    |
      XPost: rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.sf.science       From: bap@shrdlu.com              On 14/01/14 18:25, Doc O'Leary wrote:       > So while self-driving cars are definitely possible, my point remains       > that they'll be ushered in surrounded by a cloud of changes to the way       > the world works. Some of those changes will be easy to predict, and       > some with be complete surprises. It's just outright*wrong* if all you       > do is apply today's thinking to a world where a fanciful technology is       > commonplace.              I could probably put together a design for self-driving cars that could       be built with today's technology. What I can't see is a transition state       where some cars are self-driving and others aren't. I think it might       have to be a big-bang transition where from 00:00 on day zero all cars       are required to have all of the systems in place and operational. Cars       (and other vehicles) without the system become museum pieces literally       overnight. It might be simpler (and cheaper) to build a completely new       system and scrap every existing vehicle rather than trying to retrofit       vehicles that were not designed to be self-driving.                            --       Bernard Peek       bap@shrdlu.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca