XPost: rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.sf.science   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article ,   
   Doc O'Leary wrote:   
   > In article ,   
   > Robert Bannister wrote:   
   > > On 17/01/2014 11:37 am, Rod Speed wrote:   
   > > > Robert Bannister wrote   
   > > >   
   > > >> I suppose we would all have to have locks and bars or maybe even   
   > > >> shutters on our windows to keep flying burglars out.   
   > > >   
   > > > Nar, just a decent RFID system that only lets yours   
   > > > in and visitors you choose to enable access to.   
   > >   
   > > How will that stop burglars from breaking my windows?   
   >   
   > What's stopping them now? I mean, yeah, new technology can create new   
   > problems at the same time it's solving old problems, but let's not be   
   > fearful little babies about imagined threats. If you don't currently   
   > have a problem with crooks driving up to your place and looting it,   
   > flying cars probably aren't going to suddenly change that.   
      
   You can already have more secure windows. A sound sensor to detect the   
   sound of the glass being broken has been around for many years. A newer   
   option is for the glass in the windows to have millions of "invisible"   
   micro fibres connected to an alarm system - when the glass breaks and   
   the fibres are broken, the alarm goes off. The same can be done with   
   lasers through the glass (from edge to egde).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|