home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.misc      Science fiction lovers' newsgroup      3,290 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,818 of 3,290   
   Your Name to J. Clarke   
   Re: cases where SF has predicted scienti   
   25 Jan 14 16:52:13   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.sf.science   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   J. Clarke wrote:   
   > In article , robban@clubtelco.com   
   > says...   
   > >   
   > > On 25/01/2014 7:21 am, John F. Eldredge wrote:   
   > > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:10:39 +1300, Your Name wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > >> Yep, I've done and be in numerous surveys too, and they're all   
   > > >> completely worthless due to many varying reasons, mostly thanks to the   
   > > >> idiotic and misleading way the "results" are reported.   
   > > >   
   > > > My pet peeve with surveys is that the correct answer to a question is   
   > > > often "none of the above", yet very few surveys allow this as a choice.   
   > > > Online surveys, in particular, usually won't let you save the results   
   > > > until you have chosen one of the answers the survey-writer supplied.   
   > > >   
   > >   
   > > Very true. I do a lot of online surveys, and in the box most of them   
   > > provide for comments, I find myself writing time and time again "In   
   > > Question X, you forced me to lie because...".   
   >   
   > It's not just surveys.  I was helping somebody fill out an employment   
   > application for a major hotel chain the other day and at one point it   
   > has a section on previous employment and for each one it wants "reason   
   > for leaving", with the choices being "Terminated, Promoted, Resigned,   
   > Laid Off".  There's no option for "Still employed at this job" and it   
   > won't submit the application until you pick one of the four.   
   >   
   > In the previous section, dates of employment, there's an option "to   
   > present" that one would expect to disable the "reason for leaving"   
   > requirement, but it doesn't.   
      
   Did you try going past that section? Technically a job you're still   
   doing would not be "Previous Employment", but "Current Employment", so   
   that might have been the following section.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca