XPost: rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.sf.science   
   From: jclarkeusenet@cox.net   
      
   In article <52e34a9d$0$52778$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>, dtravel@sonic.net   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 1/24/2014 5:17 PM, J. Clarke wrote:   
   > > In article , robban@clubtelco.com   
   > > says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 25/01/2014 7:21 am, John F. Eldredge wrote:   
   > >>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:10:39 +1300, Your Name wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> Yep, I've done and be in numerous surveys too, and they're all   
   > >>>> completely worthless due to many varying reasons, mostly thanks to the   
   > >>>> idiotic and misleading way the "results" are reported.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> My pet peeve with surveys is that the correct answer to a question is   
   > >>> often "none of the above", yet very few surveys allow this as a choice.   
   > >>> Online surveys, in particular, usually won't let you save the results   
   > >>> until you have chosen one of the answers the survey-writer supplied.   
   > >>>   
   > >>   
   > >> Very true. I do a lot of online surveys, and in the box most of them   
   > >> provide for comments, I find myself writing time and time again "In   
   > >> Question X, you forced me to lie because...".   
   > >   
   > > It's not just surveys.  I was helping somebody fill out an employment   
   > > application for a major hotel chain the other day and at one point it   
   > > has a section on previous employment and for each one it wants "reason   
   > > for leaving", with the choices being "Terminated, Promoted, Resigned,   
   > > Laid Off".  There's no option for "Still employed at this job" and it   
   > > won't submit the application until you pick one of the four.   
   > >   
   > > In the previous section, dates of employment, there's an option "to   
   > > present" that one would expect to disable the "reason for leaving"   
   > > requirement, but it doesn't.   
   > >   
   > And why would a company want to hire someone who has already proven they   
   > are disloyal enough to look for another job while they already have one?   
      
   Because they need workers?  I'm sorry, but looking for another job when   
   you already have one is not evidence of "disloyalty" in the US.   
      
   >   (Keep in mind that the person tossing out applications is probably   
   > thinking "why would we hire anyone so bad they don't already have a job?".)   
      
   In the US right now being out of work is not evidence of anything but   
   that one is out of work.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)