XPost: rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.sf.science   
   From: wdstarr@panix.com   
      
   In article ,   
   David DeLaney  said:   
      
   > On 2014-01-25, J. Clarke  wrote:   
   >> JRStern@foobar.invalid says...   
   >>   
   >>> Please provide an assertion that "the major technical hurdles   
   >>> have been solved" from ITER.   
   >>   
   >> If you want those exact words and won't be satisfied with   
   >> anything else please let me know now so I can killfile you and   
   >> stop wasting my time.   
   >   
   > And yet when you ask for evidence of others' claims, and they   
   > provide it in multitudes, you denigrate, downgrade, and ignore   
   > every piece provided without even looking at it.   
      
   This.   
      
   > (Hint: "I've never come across this name in my limited areas of   
   > reading" has never equaled "nobody's ever heard of it", and is not   
   > a reason to simply toss aside proffered evidence as though it were   
   > a wet and slimy dishrag. Being mocking and dismissive of others'   
   > evidence means you don't get to complain when others nitpick your   
   > proffered evidence for little things like "you know that never   
   > actually happened, right?".)   
      
   And that too.   
      
   -- wds   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)